Data report
What customers think about AI in support
Two-thirds of customers would prefer companies stopped using AI in support — even as deployment grows. Data on consumer attitudes.

64% of customers wish companies would stop using AI in support — while deployment keeps rising. There’s no contradiction: companies optimise cost per contact, and dissatisfaction is measured in a different metric.
Key figures
- 64% of customers wish companies would stop using AI in support Industry consumer surveys, 2026
- Meanwhile AI deflects over 45% of contacts away from human agents Industry AI support benchmarks, 2026
- Only around 14% of contacts reach full self-service resolution Industry AI support benchmarks, 2026
How strong is the resistance?
Stronger than most companies deploying automation expect. 2026 surveys put 64% of customers wishing companies would stop using AI in service Industry consumer surveys, 2026 .
The methodological boundary matters: this is a stated attitude, not behaviour. Question wording strongly affects results in surveys like these — «would you rather speak to a human» and «are you satisfied with the response speed» produce different pictures from the same sample.
Why is deployment rising anyway?
Because companies and customers optimise different things. Deployment is driven by cost per contact, which is measured precisely and immediately. Customer attitude is measured indirectly and with a lag.
The data shows exactly that divergence: AI deflects over 45% of contacts away from human agents Industry AI support benchmarks, 2026 while only around 14% reach full resolution Industry AI support benchmarks, 2026 . The difference between those numbers is the part of the experience that forms the negative attitude.
What are customers actually objecting to?
Not the technology but the dead end. Surveys point at specific scenarios: being unable to reach a human, repeating the same question, answers that miss the point.
That distinction matters in practice. An automated answer that resolved the question in ten seconds provokes no resistance — it isn’t even noticed as automated. Resistance comes from a bot you can’t get out of.
What follows for deployment?
One condition that changes the whole picture: an explicit and fast route to a human on request. The data doesn’t support «don’t deploy AI»; it supports «AI must not be a barrier».
The practical test for your own deployment is to compare satisfaction in conversations that passed through AI against those that reached a human directly. If the gap is large, the problem isn’t the automation but how easily people can leave it.
Where do these figures come from?
This report aggregates 2026 consumer surveys on attitudes to AI in customer service and sets them against benchmarks of how AI support actually performs. Attitude data describes a stated position rather than observed behaviour; survey question wording materially affects results, so absolute percentages should be read as orders of magnitude.
Frequently asked questions
-
01 How many customers are against AI in support?
2026 surveys put it at 64% who wish companies would stop using AI in service. That's a stated attitude rather than behaviour: the same people use automated answers happily when those work quickly.
-
02 How does that square with rising deployment?
There's no contradiction. Companies deploy AI for cost per contact, not for satisfaction. The data shows those two goals can diverge — and that's where brand risk appears.
-
03 Why do people react negatively to AI in support?
Surveys point at specific experiences rather than the technology: being unable to reach a human, repeating the same question, and answers that miss the point. What's rejected isn't automation but the dead end.
-
04 Does this mean AI shouldn't be deployed?
No. The data points to a condition instead: AI that hands over to a human quickly on request doesn't generate this resistance. The problem arises where automation becomes a barrier rather than a first line.
-
05 How do you measure AI's effect on your own customers?
Compare satisfaction in conversations that went through AI with those that reached a human directly. A large gap means the issue isn't AI itself but how easily people can get out of it.



