Editorial policy
Methodology & editorial policy
We publish benchmarks and statistics for social commerce from verified primary sources. Here is exactly how we work.
-
§01
Who pays us
We are not an agency and belong to no tool. We mention tools only when relevant — neutrally, with pros and cons. No coverage can be bought.
-
§02
Fact-checking
Every number carries a source and a year. We avoid "studies show" without a concrete link, and we flag data that is contested.
-
§03
Sources
We rely on open industry reports, public benchmarks and official platform data. We give ranges, not one "correct" figure.
-
§04
Authors
Every article is signed by a real author with experience in the topic. Their bio is visible on the article and in their profile.
-
§05
Updates
We review and update our content; the last-updated date shows on every article. We replace stale numbers rather than leave them as is.
-
§06
Corrections
Spotted an error? We fix it and, if it is material, note the correction in the article. Accuracy beats speed.
- Primary
An original study or a platform’s own official figures.
- Self-reported
Numbers a platform reports about itself — flagged separately.
- Forecast
An analyst estimate of the future — a projection, not a fact.
- Range
We give a range, not a single “correct” number.
Spotted an inaccuracy? convindex@outlook.com